Skip to content
InnoReviews

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

WINNER
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)
60.6Inno Score
VS
68Performance44
56.4Display37.4
86.7Battery86.7
20Portability35.9
5 spec wins — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)1 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

InnoReviews verdict

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) wins this laptop face-off, 60.6 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+24) and display (+19). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)

  • Stronger performance score: 68 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 56 vs 37
  • 300% higher storage: 2,048 GB vs 512 GB
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 93% higher Peak brightness: 526 nits vs 273 nits

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger portability score: 36 vs 20
  • 19% lower weight: 2.27 kg vs 2.8 kg

Display

Display comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS (WQXGA, G-SYNC)IPS-level (G-Sync)
Resolution2560x16001920x1200
Refresh rate240 Hz+45%165 Hz
Peak brightness526 nits+93%273 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
ProcessorIntel Core i9-14900HXIntel Core i7-13650HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop (140W)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
RAM32 GB+100%16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage2,048 GB+300%512 GB
Storage typePCIe Gen 4 NVMe SSD (2x M.2 slots, RAID 0)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Battery

Battery comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Charging—240 W

Design

Design comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Weight2.8 kg2.27 kg+19%
Thickness27.9 mm+1%28.2 mm
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseAluminum lid, plastic base

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Ports2x Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C, DisplayPort), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, 2.5G Ethernet, microSD, 3.5mm combo jackThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (Intel Killer)Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.35.2
Webcam720p (1080p optional)720p HD
BiometricsNo fingerprint readerNone

Software

Software comparison: Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAcer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup