Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) vs ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

WINNER
Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)
59.9Inno Score
VS
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
57.7Inno Score
61.6Performance49.3
55.5Display55
94.7Battery86.7
20Portability42.5
4 spec wins — Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

InnoReviews verdict

Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) wins this laptop face-off, 59.9 to 57.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+12) and battery (+8). ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)

  • Stronger performance score: 62 vs 49
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 87
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
  • 29% higher charging: 360 W vs 280 W

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

  • Stronger portability score: 43 vs 20
  • 33% lower weight: 2.27 kg vs 3.4 kg
  • 22% lower thickness: 22.1 mm vs 28.5 mm

Display

Display comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPSIPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate240 Hz+45%165 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HXAMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6, 140W)
RAM32 GB+100%16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-6400 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5200 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (3 M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,925Top 31%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)18,978Top 17%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Capacity96 Wh+7%90 Wh
Charging360 W+29%280 W

Design

Design comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Weight3.4 kg2.27 kg+33%
Thickness28.5 mm22.1 mm+22%

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Ports2x Thunderbolt 5 (DisplayPort 2.1, Power Delivery), 3x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, SD card reader, 3.5mm combo jack2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, G-SYNC; one with power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.45.2
Webcam1080p or 4K (8MP) with IR720p HD
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)—

Software

Software comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup