Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

WINNER
Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)
59.9Inno Score
VS
61.6Performance44
55.5Display37.4
94.7Battery86.7
20Portability35.9
6 spec wins — Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

InnoReviews verdict

Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) wins this laptop face-off, 59.9 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in display (+18) and performance (+18). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)

  • Stronger performance score: 62 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 56 vs 37
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 87
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger portability score: 36 vs 20
  • 33% lower weight: 2.27 kg vs 3.4 kg

Display

Display comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPSIPS-level (G-Sync)
Resolution2560x16001920x1200
Refresh rate240 Hz+45%165 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits+83%273 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HXIntel Core i7-13650HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
RAM32 GB+100%16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-6400 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage1,024 GB+100%512 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (3 M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Geekbench 6 (single)2,925Top 31%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)18,978Top 17%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Capacity96 Wh+7%90 Wh
Charging360 W+50%240 W

Design

Design comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Weight3.4 kg2.27 kg+33%
Thickness28.5 mm28.2 mm+1%
Material—Aluminum lid, plastic base

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Ports2x Thunderbolt 5 (DisplayPort 2.1, Power Delivery), 3x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, SD card reader, 3.5mm combo jackThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.45.2
Webcam1080p or 4K (8MP) with IR720p HD
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)None

Software

Software comparison: Alienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 16 Area-51 (AA16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup