Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) vs ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)

WINNER
Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)
52.6Inno Score
VS
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
45.2Inno Score
51.1Performance45
31.8Display38.3
94.7Battery54.3
32.7Portability44.2
5 spec wins — Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)

InnoReviews verdict

Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) wins this laptop face-off, 52.6 to 45.2, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+40) and performance (+6). ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)

  • Stronger performance score: 51 vs 45
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 54
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • Lower launch price: $1,150 vs $1,399

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)

  • Stronger display score: 38 vs 32
  • Stronger portability score: 44 vs 33
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 33% higher charging: 240 W vs 180 W
  • 14% lower weight: 2.2 kg vs 2.57 kg

Display

Display comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
Screen size16 ″+3%15.6 ″
Panel typeIPSIPS (2.5K)
Resolution2560x16002560x1440
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz+38%
Peak brightness300 nits300 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
ProcessorIntel Core 7 240HAMD Ryzen 9 8945H
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
RAM32 GB+100%16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,699+2%Bottom 49%2,650Bottom 45%
Geekbench 6 (multi)13,815+8%Top 43%12,800Bottom 43%

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
Capacity96 Wh+7%90 Wh
Web browsing endurance—8 h
Charging180 W240 W+33%

Design

Design comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
Weight2.57 kg2.2 kg+14%
Thickness22.7 mm22.4 mm+1%
MaterialAnodized aluminum lid, plastic deck and base, magnesium alloy internal frameAluminum lid, polycarbonate base

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
Ports2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (one with DisplayPort 1.4, one with Power Delivery), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm headset jack1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (DP, 100W PD), 1x USB4, 2x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, RJ-45, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.45.3
Webcam720p720p
BiometricsNoneNone

Software

Software comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup