Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) vs ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)
52.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
57.7Inno Score
51.1Performance49.3
31.8Display55
94.7Battery86.7
32.7Portability42.5
2 spec wins — Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins this laptop face-off, 57.7 to 52.6, pulling ahead mainly in display (+23) and portability (+10). Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)

  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 87
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 32
  • Stronger portability score: 43 vs 33
  • 56% higher charging: 280 W vs 180 W
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 12% lower weight: 2.27 kg vs 2.57 kg

Display

Display comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPSIPS-level, anti-glare, G-Sync
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz+38%
Peak brightness300 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
ProcessorIntel Core 7 240HAMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6, 140W)
RAM32 GB+100%16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5200 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,699Bottom 49%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)13,815Top 43%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Capacity96 Wh+7%90 Wh
Charging180 W280 W+56%

Design

Design comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Weight2.57 kg2.27 kg+12%
Thickness22.7 mm22.1 mm+3%
MaterialAnodized aluminum lid, plastic deck and base, magnesium alloy internal frame—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Ports2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (one with DisplayPort 1.4, one with Power Delivery), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm headset jack2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, G-SYNC; one with power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.45.2
Webcam720p720p HD
BiometricsNone—

Software

Software comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup