Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)
52.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
63.8Inno Score
51.1Performance62.7
31.8Display55
94.7Battery86.7
32.7Portability50.3
1 spec wins — Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 63.8 to 52.6, pulling ahead mainly in display (+23) and portability (+18). Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)

  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 87

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 63 vs 51
  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 32
  • Stronger portability score: 50 vs 33
  • 56% higher charging: 280 W vs 180 W
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz

Display

Display comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPSIPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-Sync
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate120 Hz165 Hz+38%
Peak brightness300 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core 7 240HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz)
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7)
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,699Bottom 49%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)13,815Top 43%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Capacity96 Wh+7%90 Wh
Charging180 W280 W+56%

Design

Design comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Weight2.57 kg2.2 kg+14%
Thickness22.7 mm17.9 mm+21%
MaterialAnodized aluminum lid, plastic deck and base, magnesium alloy internal frameAluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H tested

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Ports2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (one with DisplayPort 1.4, one with Power Delivery), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm headset jack1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam720p1080p FHD IR camera
BiometricsNoneIR camera with Windows Hello face recognition

Software

Software comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup