Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) vs IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11

WINNER
Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)
52.6Inno Score
VS
IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
35.2Inno Score
51.1Performance30.7
31.8Display23.3
94.7Battery29.3
32.7Portability67.7
6 spec wins — Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)2 spec wins — IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11

InnoReviews verdict

Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) wins this laptop face-off, 52.6 to 35.2, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+65) and performance (+20). IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)

  • Stronger performance score: 51 vs 31
  • Stronger display score: 32 vs 23
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 29
  • 300% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 8 GB
  • 177% higher charging: 180 W vs 65 W

Reasons to pick the IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11

  • Stronger portability score: 68 vs 33
  • 37% lower weight: 1.62 kg vs 2.57 kg
  • 21% lower thickness: 17.9 mm vs 22.7 mm
  • Lower launch price: $549 vs $1,150

Display

Display comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
Screen size16 ″+3%15.6 ″
Panel typeIPSIPS LCD
Resolution2560x16001920x1080
Refresh rate120 Hz+100%60 Hz
Peak brightness300 nits300 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
ProcessorIntel Core 7 240HIntel Core 3 100U
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 LaptopIntel Graphics
RAM32 GB+300%8 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5
Storage1,024 GB+100%512 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
Geekbench 6 (single)2,699Bottom 49%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)13,815Top 43%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
Capacity96 Wh+104%47 Wh
Charging180 W+177%65 W

Design

Design comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
Weight2.57 kg1.62 kg+37%
Thickness22.7 mm17.9 mm+21%
MaterialAnodized aluminum lid, plastic deck and base, magnesium alloy internal framePolycarbonate-ABS plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
Ports2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (one with DisplayPort 1.4, one with Power Delivery), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm headset jack1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 1 (Power Delivery, DisplayPort), 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, 1x HDMI 1.4b, 1x SD card reader, 1x 3.5mm combo audio
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.2
Webcam720p1080p FHD with privacy shutter
BiometricsNoneFingerprint reader on power button

Software

Software comparison: Alienware 16 Aurora (AC16250) versus IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
SpecAlienware 16 Aurora (AC16250)IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup