Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware 18 Area-51 vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

WINNER
Alienware 18 Area-51
63.6Inno Score
VS
64.4Performance44
64.1Display37.4
94.7Battery86.7
23.6Portability35.9
8 spec wins — Alienware 18 Area-511 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

InnoReviews verdict

Alienware 18 Area-51 wins this laptop face-off, 63.6 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in display (+27) and performance (+20). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware 18 Area-51

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 64 vs 37
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 87
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger portability score: 36 vs 24
  • 45% lower weight: 2.27 kg vs 4.12 kg

Display

Display comparison: Alienware 18 Area-51 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 18 Area-51ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Screen size18 ″+13%16 ″
Panel typeIPS LCDIPS-level (G-Sync)
Resolution2560x16001920x1200
Refresh rate300 Hz+82%165 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits+83%273 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware 18 Area-51 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 18 Area-51ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HXIntel Core i7-13650HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (RTX 5060, RTX 5070, RTX 5070 Ti and RTX 5090 optional)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
RAM32 GB+100%16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-6400 (SODIMM)DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage1,024 GB+100%512 GB
Storage typeM.2 NVMe SSD (PCIe 4.0/5.0)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware 18 Area-51 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 18 Area-51ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Geekbench 6 (single)3,057Top 20%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)19,869Top 14%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware 18 Area-51 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 18 Area-51ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Capacity96 Wh+7%90 Wh
Charging360 W+50%240 W

Design

Design comparison: Alienware 18 Area-51 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 18 Area-51ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Weight4.12 kg2.27 kg+45%
Thickness24.3 mm+14%28.2 mm
MaterialAnodized aluminumAluminum lid, plastic base

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware 18 Area-51 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 18 Area-51ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Ports2x Thunderbolt 5 (DisplayPort 2.1, Power Delivery; Thunderbolt 4 on RTX 5070 and below), 3x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.1, 5Gbps RJ-45, SD card reader, 3.5mm audio jackThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.45.2
Webcam1080p + IR camera (4K option)720p HD
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)None

Software

Software comparison: Alienware 18 Area-51 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecAlienware 18 Area-51ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup