Skip to content
InnoReviews

Alienware m16 R2 vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

Alienware m16 R2
51.5Inno Score
VS
WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
63.8Inno Score
42.1Performance62.7
49Display55
86.7Battery86.7
30.4Portability50.3
1 spec wins — Alienware m16 R24 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 63.8 to 51.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+21) and portability (+20). Alienware m16 R2 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Alienware m16 R2

  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 63 vs 42
  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 49
  • Stronger portability score: 50 vs 30
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 24% lower thickness: 17.9 mm vs 23.5 mm

Display

Display comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS (G-Sync, Advanced Optimus)IPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-Sync
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate240 Hz+45%165 Hz
Peak brightness300 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz)
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (RTX 4060 / 4070 optional)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7)
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,383Bottom 18%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)12,670Bottom 42%—

Battery

Battery comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Charging240 W280 W+17%

Design

Design comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Weight2.61 kg2.2 kg+16%
Thickness23.5 mm17.9 mm+24%
MaterialAnodized aluminum lid, soft-touch deckAluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H tested

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
PortsThunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort 1.4, 15W PD), USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (DisplayPort 1.4), 2x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, 2.5GbE RJ-45, microSD, 3.5mm combo1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (Wi-Fi 7 optional)Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.35.4
Webcam1080p + IR1080p FHD IR camera
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)IR camera with Windows Hello face recognition

Software

Software comparison: Alienware m16 R2 versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
SpecAlienware m16 R2ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup