Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) vs ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)

WINNER
ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)
56.5Inno Score
VS
ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
55.6Inno Score
68.2Performance68
78.4Display55
42.9Battery50.7
20Portability38.2
4 spec wins — ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) scores 56.5 against 55.6 for ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) edges ahead in display and performance, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)

  • Stronger display score: 78 vs 55
  • 153% higher charging: 380 W vs 150 W
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
  • 43% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 63 Wh
  • 13% higher Screen size: 18 ″ vs 16 ″

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)

  • Stronger battery score: 51 vs 43
  • Stronger portability score: 38 vs 20
  • 33% lower weight: 2.2 kg vs 3.3 kg
  • 16% lower thickness: 26.9 mm vs 32 mm

Display

Display comparison: ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) versus ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
SpecASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
Screen size18 ″+13%16 ″
Panel typeMini-LED (ROG Nebula HDR)IPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate240 Hz+45%165 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits—

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) versus ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
SpecASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HXIntel Core i7-14650HX (up to 5.2GHz, 16C/24T)
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 85W (8GB GDDR7)
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)
Storage2,048 GB2,048 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2x M.2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) versus ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
SpecASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
Geekbench 6 (single)3,100Top 29%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)21,000Top 16%—

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) versus ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
SpecASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
Capacity90 Wh+43%63 Wh
Web browsing endurance5 h—
Charging380 W+153%150 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) versus ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
SpecASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
Weight3.3 kg2.2 kg+33%
Thickness32 mm26.9 mm+16%
MaterialAluminum lid + polycarbonateAll-black chassis with an anti-fingerprint coating, MIL-STD-810H tested

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) versus ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
SpecASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
PortsThunderbolt 5, USB-C 3.2 (DP, 100W PD), 3x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, 2.5G Ethernet, 3.5mm2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery), 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam1080p + IR720p HD camera
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025) versus ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
SpecASUS ROG Strix Scar 18 (2025)ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup