Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

WINNER
ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)
60.6Inno Score
VS
46.6Performance44
55.5Display37.4
86.7Battery86.7
62.8Portability35.9
5 spec wins — ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)1 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) wins this laptop face-off, 60.6 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+27) and display (+18). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)

  • Stronger display score: 56 vs 37
  • Stronger portability score: 63 vs 36
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 83% higher Peak brightness: 500 nits vs 273 nits
  • 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • 20% higher charging: 240 W vs 200 W

Display

Display comparison: ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeOLED (ROG Nebula HDR)IPS-level (G-Sync)
Resolution2560x16001920x1200
Refresh rate240 Hz+45%165 Hz
Peak brightness500 nits+83%273 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 185HIntel Core i7-13650HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5X-7467 (soldered)DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage1,024 GB+100%512 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Geekbench 6 (single)2,525Bottom 35%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)14,588Top 40%—

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Capacity90 Wh90 Wh
Charging200 W240 W+20%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Weight1.85 kg+19%2.27 kg
Thickness16.4 mm+42%28.2 mm
MaterialCNC aluminum alloyAluminum lid, plastic base

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, SD card reader (UHS-II), 3.5mm combo audioThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.35.2
Webcam1080p FHD with IR720p HD
BiometricsIR face (Windows Hello)None

Software

Software comparison: ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) versus ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
SpecASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup