ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) vs ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
46.6Performance62.7
55.5Display55
86.7Battery86.7
62.8Portability50.3
3 spec wins — ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
InnoReviews verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 63.8 to 60.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+16). ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)
- Stronger portability score: 63 vs 50
- 45% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 165 Hz
- 16% lower weight: 1.85 kg vs 2.2 kg
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
- Stronger performance score: 63 vs 47
- 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 40% higher charging: 280 W vs 200 W
Display
| Spec | ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″ | 16 ″ |
| Panel type | OLED (ROG Nebula HDR) | IPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-Sync |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 2560x1600 |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz+45% | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz) |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7) |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X-7467 (soldered) | DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots) | PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,525Bottom 35% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 14,588Top 40% | — |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 90 Wh | 90 Wh |
| Charging | 200 W | 280 W+40% |
Design
| Spec | ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.85 kg+16% | 2.2 kg |
| Thickness | 16.4 mm+8% | 17.9 mm |
| Material | CNC aluminum alloy | Aluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H tested |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | Thunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, SD card reader (UHS-II), 3.5mm combo audio | 1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Webcam | 1080p FHD with IR | 1080p FHD IR camera |
| Biometrics | IR face (Windows Hello) | IR camera with Windows Hello face recognition |
Software
| Spec | ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024) | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)vs Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024)VSASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)vs Lenovo Legion Pro 5i Gen 10 (16IAX10)VSASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)vs HUAWEI MateBook Pro SVSASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2024)vs HUAWEI MateBook X Pro (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)vs ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)vs Alienware 18 Area-51VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)vs Framework Laptop 13 ProVSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)vs ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)VS