Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) vs LG Gram 17 (2025)

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)
55.6Inno Score
VS
LG Gram 17 (2025)
52Inno Score
68Performance41.5
55Display24.9
50.7Battery79.8
38.2Portability76
4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)4 spec wins — LG Gram 17 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) wins this laptop face-off, 55.6 to 52, pulling ahead mainly in display (+30) and performance (+27). LG Gram 17 (2025) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)

  • Stronger performance score: 68 vs 42
  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 25
  • 175% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 131% higher charging: 150 W vs 65 W
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB

Reasons to pick the LG Gram 17 (2025)

  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 51
  • Stronger portability score: 76 vs 38
  • 39% lower weight: 1.35 kg vs 2.2 kg
  • 34% lower thickness: 17.8 mm vs 26.9 mm
  • 22% higher capacity: 77 Wh vs 63 Wh

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Screen size16 ″17 ″+6%
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGBIPS
Resolution2560x16002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz+175%60 Hz
Peak brightness—350 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)LG Gram 17 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core i7-14650HX (up to 5.2GHz, 16C/24T)Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 85W (8GB GDDR7)Intel Arc Graphics 140V
RAM32 GB+100%16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)
Storage2,048 GB+100%1,024 GB
Storage typeM.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2x M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,640Bottom 39%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,700Bottom 7%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Capacity63 Wh77 Wh+22%
Web browsing endurance—16 h
Charging150 W+131%65 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Weight2.2 kg1.35 kg+39%
Thickness26.9 mm17.8 mm+34%
MaterialAll-black chassis with an anti-fingerprint coating, MIL-STD-810H testedMagnesium alloy

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 2.0 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery), 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x USB-A, HDMI, microSD, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam720p HD camera1080p
Biometrics—Fingerprint reader

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming 16 (2026)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup