ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) vs ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
48.5Performance25.3
41.5Display23.3
64Battery33.3
69.8Portability69.7
7 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)2 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
InnoReviews verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) wins this laptop face-off, 54 to 34.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+31) and performance (+23). ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)
- Stronger performance score: 49 vs 25
- Stronger display score: 42 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 64 vs 33
- 300% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 256 GB
- 194% higher charging: 200 W vs 68 W
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
- 15% lower thickness: 16.9 mm vs 19.9 mm
- 14% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 14 ″
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 14 ″ | 16 ″+14% |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare (100% sRGB, G-Sync) | OLED (100% DCI-P3, 1,000,000:1 contrast) |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 1920x1200 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+175% | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits+33% | 300 nits |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-101 (8-core, up to 2.97GHz, 30MB cache) |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6) | Qualcomm Adreno GPU (integrated) |
| RAM | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X-7500 (soldered) | LPDDR5X (onboard, not upgradeable) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB+300% | 256 GB |
| Storage type | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD (2 slots) | M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD (single M.2 2280 slot, single-sided SSD only) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,846Top 39% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 13,799Top 45% | — |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 73 Wh+46% | 50 Wh |
| Charging | 200 W+194% | 68 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.46 kg+9% | 1.6 kg |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 16.9 mm+15% |
| Material | Aluminum lid and bottom panel, plastic keyboard deck (MIL-STD-810H tested) | Full-metal chassis, MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability testing |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 1x USB4 (DisplayPort/PD), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, microSD reader (UHS-II), 3.5mm combo audio jack | 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort/Power Delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Webcam | 1080p FHD IR camera | FHD IR camera with Windows Hello support |
| Biometrics | Windows Hello IR face recognition | Windows Hello IR camera (no fingerprint reader) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)vs Razer Blade 16 (2025)VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)vs Acer Predator Helios 16 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)vs ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)vs ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite)VSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)vs Asus Vivobook 14VSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)vs Lenovo Prima 14 IWCVSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)vs IdeaPad Slim 3i Gen 11VSASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)vs Dell 15 (DC15250)VS