ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) vs ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)
45Performance37.8
38.3Display41.6
54.3Battery66.7
44.2Portability74
5 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)4 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)
InnoReviews verdict
ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) wins this laptop face-off, 51.6 to 45.2, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+30) and battery (+12). ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)
- Stronger performance score: 45 vs 38
- 167% higher charging: 240 W vs 90 W
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 22% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,650 vs 2,173
- 20% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 75 Wh
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)
- Stronger display score: 42 vs 38
- Stronger battery score: 67 vs 54
- Stronger portability score: 74 vs 44
- 100% higher Peak brightness: 600 nits vs 300 nits
- 32% lower weight: 1.5 kg vs 2.2 kg
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 15.6 ″ | 16 ″+3% |
| Panel type | IPS (2.5K) | OLED, glossy, non-touch (100% DCI-P3, VESA HDR True Black 600) |
| Resolution | 2560x1440 | 3200x2000 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 300 nits | 600 nits+100% |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 8945H | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop | Intel Arc Graphics |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM) | LPDDR5X (soldered) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots) | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,650+22%Bottom 45% | 2,173Bottom 4% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 12,800+14%Bottom 43% | 11,273Bottom 20% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 90 Wh+20% | 75 Wh |
| Web browsing endurance | 8 h | — |
| Charging | 240 W+167% | 90 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.5 kg+32% |
| Thickness | 22.4 mm | 15.9 mm+29% |
| Material | Aluminum lid, polycarbonate base | Metal chassis (MIL-STD-810H tested) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (DP, 100W PD), 1x USB4, 2x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, RJ-45, 3.5mm | 2x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort/PD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, microSD reader, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Webcam | 720p | 1080p FHD IR camera with privacy shutter |
| Biometrics | None | Windows Hello IR face recognition (no fingerprint reader) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024) | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)vs MSI Katana 15 HX B14WVSASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)vs ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5652MA)VSASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)vs Dell Inspiron 16 Plus (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming A15 (2024)vs Dell 16 Plus (DB16250)VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs Alienware m16 R2VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs Lenovo Legion 5i Gen 9 (16IRX9)VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14VS