Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
57.7Inno Score
VS
ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
34.6Inno Score
49.3Performance25.3
55Display23.3
86.7Battery33.3
42.5Portability69.7
5 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)2 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins this laptop face-off, 57.7 to 34.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+53) and display (+32). ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

  • Stronger performance score: 49 vs 25
  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 23
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 33
  • 312% higher charging: 280 W vs 68 W
  • 300% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 256 GB

Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)

  • Stronger portability score: 70 vs 43
  • 30% lower weight: 1.6 kg vs 2.27 kg
  • 24% lower thickness: 16.9 mm vs 22.1 mm

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, G-SyncOLED (100% DCI-P3, 1,000,000:1 contrast)
Resolution2560x16001920x1200
Refresh rate165 Hz+175%60 Hz
Peak brightness—300 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 9 7940HXQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-101 (8-core, up to 2.97GHz, 30MB cache)
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6, 140W)Qualcomm Adreno GPU (integrated)
RAM16 GB+100%8 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5200 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)LPDDR5X (onboard, not upgradeable)
Storage1,024 GB+300%256 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)M.2 NVMe PCIe SSD (single M.2 2280 slot, single-sided SSD only)

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
Capacity90 Wh+80%50 Wh
Charging280 W+312%68 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
Weight2.27 kg1.6 kg+30%
Thickness22.1 mm16.9 mm+24%
Material—Full-metal chassis, MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability testing

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, G-SYNC; one with power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort/Power Delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.25.3
Webcam720p HDFHD IR camera with Windows Hello support
Biometrics—Windows Hello IR camera (no fingerprint reader)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup