Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) vs MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)
57.7Inno Score
VS
MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
48.8Inno Score
49.3Performance47.8
55Display41.6
86.7Battery54.2
42.5Portability53.8
2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)4 spec wins — MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) wins this laptop face-off, 57.7 to 48.8, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+33) and display (+13). MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)

  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 54
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 17% higher charging: 280 W vs 240 W

Reasons to pick the MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio

  • Stronger portability score: 54 vs 43
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 12% lower weight: 1.99 kg vs 2.27 kg
  • 11% higher capacity: 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
  • 10% lower thickness: 20 mm vs 22.1 mm

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, G-SyncOLED (UHD+)
Resolution2560x16003840x2400
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness—600 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
ProcessorAMD Ryzen 9 7940HXIntel Core Ultra 9 185H
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR6, 140W)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-5200 (SO-DIMM, 2 slots, up to 64GB)LPDDR5X-6400 (soldered)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,450Bottom 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—13,300Bottom 50%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Capacity90 Wh100 Wh+11%
Web browsing endurance—7 h
Charging280 W+17%240 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Weight2.27 kg1.99 kg+12%
Thickness22.1 mm20 mm+10%
Material—Magnesium-aluminum alloy

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, G-SYNC; one with power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x Thunderbolt 4, 1x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, microSD, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam720p HD1080p + IR
Biometrics—IR face (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup