Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)

VS
WINNER
ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
57.2Inno Score
44Performance49.3
37.4Display41.6
86.7Battery66.7
35.9Portability82.7
4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6074 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406) wins this laptop face-off, 57.2 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+47) and performance (+5). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 67
  • 167% higher charging: 240 W vs 90 W
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 20% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 75 Wh
  • 14% higher Screen size: 16 ″ vs 14 ″

Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)

  • Stronger performance score: 49 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 42 vs 37
  • Stronger portability score: 83 vs 36
  • 120% higher Peak brightness: 600 nits vs 273 nits
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
Screen size16 ″+14%14 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)OLED (Lumina, 100% DCI-P3, HDR True Black 600)
Resolution1920x12002880x1800
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness273 nits600 nits+120%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopIntel Arc Graphics
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5X (on board)
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
Capacity90 Wh+20%75 Wh
Charging240 W+167%90 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
Weight2.27 kg1.3 kg+43%
Thickness28.2 mm13.9 mm+51%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseMetal

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x Thunderbolt 4 (display/PD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, microSD card reader, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)
Bluetooth5.25.2
Webcam720p HDFHD with IR and privacy shutter
BiometricsNoneIR camera (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED (S5406)
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup