ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)
44Performance37.8
37.4Display41.6
86.7Battery66.7
35.9Portability74
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6074 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 scores 50.3 against 51.6 for ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606). Pick by the categories that matter to you — ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) edges ahead in portability and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
- Stronger performance score: 44 vs 38
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 67
- 167% higher charging: 240 W vs 90 W
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 20% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 75 Wh
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)
- Stronger display score: 42 vs 37
- Stronger portability score: 74 vs 36
- 120% higher Peak brightness: 600 nits vs 273 nits
- 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- 44% lower thickness: 15.9 mm vs 28.2 mm
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″ | 16 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level (G-Sync) | OLED, glossy, non-touch (100% DCI-P3, VESA HDR True Black 600) |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 3200x2000 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 273 nits | 600 nits+120% |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core i7-13650HX | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | Intel Arc Graphics |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM) | LPDDR5X (soldered) |
| Storage | 512 GB | 1,024 GB+100% |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots) | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,173Bottom 4% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 11,273Bottom 20% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 90 Wh+20% | 75 Wh |
| Charging | 240 W+167% | 90 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 1.5 kg+34% |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 15.9 mm+44% |
| Material | Aluminum lid, plastic base | Metal chassis (MIL-STD-810H tested) |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | Thunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio | 2x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort/PD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, microSD reader, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Webcam | 720p HD | 1080p FHD IR camera with privacy shutter |
| Biometrics | None | Windows Hello IR face recognition (no fingerprint reader) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 | Windows 11 Home |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs HP Spectre x360 14 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Dell XPS 13 (9345)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition (15", 9)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraVSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs Alienware m16 R2VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs Lenovo Legion 5i Gen 9 (16IRX9)VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14VS