ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)
44Performance51.6
37.4Display38.4
86.7Battery70.7
35.9Portability79.4
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6075 spec wins — ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)
InnoReviews verdict
ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) wins this laptop face-off, 57.5 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+44) and performance (+8). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 71
- 269% higher charging: 240 W vs 65 W
- 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 15% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 78 Wh
Reasons to pick the ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)
- Stronger performance score: 52 vs 44
- Stronger portability score: 79 vs 36
- 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
- 83% higher Peak brightness: 500 nits vs 273 nits
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″ | 16 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level (G-Sync) | OLED touchscreen (Lumina, 100% DCI-P3, HDR True Black 500) |
| Resolution | 1920x1200 | 2880x1800 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 273 nits | 500 nits+83% |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core i7-13650HX | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop | AMD Radeon 890M Graphics |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM type | DDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM) | LPDDR5X (on board) |
| Storage | 512 GB | 1,024 GB+100% |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots) | M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,817Top 43% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 13,363Top 50% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 90 Wh+15% | 78 Wh |
| Charging | 240 W+269% | 65 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.27 kg | 1.5 kg+34% |
| Thickness | 28.2 mm | 11.9 mm+58% |
| Material | Aluminum lid, plastic base | Ceraluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | Thunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio | 2x USB4 Type-C (40Gbps, display/PD), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, SD 4.0 card reader, 3.5mm combo audio jack |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Webcam | 720p HD | FHD with IR |
| Biometrics | None | IR camera (Windows Hello) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 | ASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 | Windows 11 Pro |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs HP Spectre x360 14 (2024)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Dell XPS 13 (9345)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Aura Edition (15", 9)VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607vs Samsung Galaxy Book4 UltraVSASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)vs Apple MacBook Air 13 (M4)VSASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)vs Dell XPS 14 (2026)VSASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)vs ASUS TUF Gaming A16 (2024)VSASUS Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)vs ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 Aura EditionVS