Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs HP HyperX OMEN 15

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
50.3Inno Score
VS
HP HyperX OMEN 15
48.8Inno Score
44Performance46.5
37.4Display46.9
86.7Battery60
35.9Portability42.3
2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6076 spec wins — HP HyperX OMEN 15

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 wins this laptop face-off, 50.3 to 48.8, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+27). HP HyperX OMEN 15 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 60
  • 29% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 70 Wh

Reasons to pick the HP HyperX OMEN 15

  • Stronger display score: 47 vs 37
  • Stronger portability score: 42 vs 36
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 83% higher Peak brightness: 500 nits vs 273 nits
  • 17% higher charging: 280 W vs 240 W

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP HyperX OMEN 15
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP HyperX OMEN 15
Screen size16 ″+5%15.3 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)IPS
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz180 Hz+9%
Peak brightness273 nits500 nits+83%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP HyperX OMEN 15
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP HyperX OMEN 15
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core i7-14650HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU (8GB GDDR7)
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP HyperX OMEN 15
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP HyperX OMEN 15
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,731Top 49%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—13,236Bottom 50%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP HyperX OMEN 15
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP HyperX OMEN 15
Capacity90 Wh+29%70 Wh
Charging240 W280 W+17%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP HyperX OMEN 15
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP HyperX OMEN 15
Weight2.27 kg2.21 kg+3%
Thickness28.2 mm23.6 mm+16%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseMostly plastic chassis in Shadow Black; keyboard keycaps, scissors and plate contain post-consumer recycled plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP HyperX OMEN 15
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP HyperX OMEN 15
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x USB-A (10Gbps), 1x USB-C (10Gbps, USB Power Delivery 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4), HDMI 2.1, RJ-45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam720p HD1080p FHD webcam with HDR auto switch
BiometricsNone—

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP HyperX OMEN 15
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP HyperX OMEN 15
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup