Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)

VS
WINNER
HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
57.8Inno Score
44Performance64.7
37.4Display55.5
86.7Battery77.3
35.9Portability23.6
2 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6076 spec wins — HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)

InnoReviews verdict

HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000) wins this laptop face-off, 57.8 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+21) and display (+18). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 77
  • Stronger portability score: 36 vs 24
  • 15% lower weight: 2.27 kg vs 2.68 kg

Reasons to pick the HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)

  • Stronger performance score: 65 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 56 vs 37
  • 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 83% higher Peak brightness: 500 nits vs 273 nits

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)OLED
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz240 Hz+45%
Peak brightness273 nits500 nits+83%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop GPU
RAM16 GB32 GB+100%
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600 (2 slots)
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe Gen4 NVMe M.2 SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,097Top 17%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—19,822Top 15%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
Capacity90 Wh+8%83 Wh
Charging240 W330 W+38%

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
Weight2.27 kg+15%2.68 kg
Thickness28.2 mm27.9 mm+1%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseAluminum lid and base, plastic keyboard deck

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x Thunderbolt 4 (40Gbps, USB PD, DisplayPort), 2x USB-A 10Gbps, HDMI 2.1, RJ-45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7 (Wi-Fi 6E on some configs)
Bluetooth5.25.4 (5.3 with Wi-Fi 6E)
Webcam720p HD1080p IR (HP True Vision) with privacy shutter
BiometricsNoneIR face recognition (Windows Hello), no fingerprint reader

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607HP OMEN MAX 16 (16-ah0000)
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup