Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
50.3Inno Score
VS
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
40.4Inno Score
44Performance42.1
37.4Display35.3
86.7Battery46.7
35.9Portability36.8
5 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6073 spec wins — Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 wins this laptop face-off, 50.3 to 40.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+40) and display (+2). Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 47
  • 50% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 60 Wh
  • 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz

Reasons to pick the Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9

  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 15% lower thickness: 23.9 mm vs 28.2 mm
  • 10% higher Peak brightness: 300 nits vs 273 nits

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
Screen size16 ″+3%15.6 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)IPS
Resolution1920x12001920x1080
Refresh rate165 Hz+15%144 Hz
Peak brightness273 nits300 nits+10%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core i5-13450HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (8GB, 115W)
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,381Bottom 17%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—12,684Bottom 43%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
Capacity90 Wh+50%60 Wh
Charging240 W+4%230 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
Weight2.27 kg+5%2.38 kg
Thickness28.2 mm23.9 mm+15%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic basePC-ABS plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio3x USB-A 5Gbps, USB-C 10Gbps (DisplayPort 1.4, power delivery), HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.25.2
Webcam720p HD1080p with e-shutter
BiometricsNoneNone

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup