Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs LG Gram 17 (2025)

VS
WINNER
LG Gram 17 (2025)
52Inno Score
44Performance41.5
37.4Display24.9
86.7Battery79.8
35.9Portability76
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6075 spec wins — LG Gram 17 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

LG Gram 17 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 52 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+40). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger display score: 37 vs 25
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 80
  • 269% higher charging: 240 W vs 65 W
  • 175% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 17% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 77 Wh

Reasons to pick the LG Gram 17 (2025)

  • Stronger portability score: 76 vs 36
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 41% lower weight: 1.35 kg vs 2.27 kg
  • 37% lower thickness: 17.8 mm vs 28.2 mm
  • 28% higher Peak brightness: 350 nits vs 273 nits

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607LG Gram 17 (2025)
Screen size16 ″17 ″+6%
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)IPS
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh rate165 Hz+175%60 Hz
Peak brightness273 nits350 nits+28%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607LG Gram 17 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopIntel Arc Graphics 140V
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607LG Gram 17 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,640Bottom 44%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,700Bottom 12%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607LG Gram 17 (2025)
Capacity90 Wh+17%77 Wh
Web browsing endurance—16 h
Charging240 W+269%65 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607LG Gram 17 (2025)
Weight2.27 kg1.35 kg+41%
Thickness28.2 mm17.8 mm+37%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseMagnesium alloy

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607LG Gram 17 (2025)
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x USB-A, HDMI, microSD, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam720p HD1080p
BiometricsNoneFingerprint reader

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607LG Gram 17 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup