Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs MSI Katana 15 HX B14W

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607
50.3Inno Score
VS
MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
45.1Inno Score
44Performance45.1
37.4Display33.9
86.7Battery66.7
35.9Portability34
5 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6071 spec wins — MSI Katana 15 HX B14W

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 wins this laptop face-off, 50.3 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+20) and display (+4). MSI Katana 15 HX B14W still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger display score: 37 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 67
  • 20% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 75 Wh
  • 15% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 144 Hz

Reasons to pick the MSI Katana 15 HX B14W

  • 10% lower thickness: 25.5 mm vs 28.2 mm

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
Screen size16 ″+3%15.6 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)IPS
Resolution1920x12001920x1080
Refresh rate165 Hz+15%144 Hz
Peak brightness273 nits+6%257 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXIntel Core i7-14650HX
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)DDR5-5600 (2x SO-DIMM)
Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,786Top 45%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—13,048Bottom 47%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
Capacity90 Wh+20%75 Wh
Charging240 W240 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
Weight2.27 kg+5%2.4 kg
Thickness28.2 mm25.5 mm+10%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic basePlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio3x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 1x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (DisplayPort, PD 3.0), HDMI 2.1, RJ-45 Gigabit Ethernet, 3.5mm combo jack
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth5.25.3
Webcam720p HD720p HD
BiometricsNoneNone

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607MSI Katana 15 HX B14W
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Related comparisons

Try another matchup