Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 vs Razer Blade 14 (2025)

VS
WINNER
R
52.7Inno Score
44Performance51.1
37.4Display34
86.7Battery62.7
35.9Portability69.7
4 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX6074 spec wins — Razer Blade 14 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

Razer Blade 14 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 52.7 to 50.3, pulling ahead mainly in portability (+34) and performance (+7). ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607

  • Stronger display score: 37 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 63
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 25% higher capacity: 90 Wh vs 72 Wh
  • 20% higher charging: 240 W vs 200 W

Reasons to pick the Razer Blade 14 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 51 vs 44
  • Stronger portability score: 70 vs 36
  • 100% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 512 GB
  • 43% lower thickness: 16.2 mm vs 28.2 mm
  • 34% higher Peak brightness: 367 nits vs 273 nits

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 14 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 14 (2025)
Screen size16 ″+14%14 ″
Panel typeIPS-level (G-Sync)OLED
Resolution1920x12002880x1800
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness273 nits367 nits+34%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 14 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 14 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core i7-13650HXAMD Ryzen AI 9 365
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 LaptopNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeDDR5-4800 (2x SO-DIMM)LPDDR5X-8000 (soldered)
Storage512 GB1,024 GB+100%
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (1 slot)

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 14 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 14 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,888Top 36%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—15,137Top 31%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 14 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 14 (2025)
Capacity90 Wh+25%72 Wh
Charging240 W+20%200 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 14 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 14 (2025)
Weight2.27 kg1.63 kg+28%
Thickness28.2 mm16.2 mm+43%
MaterialAluminum lid, plastic baseCNC aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 14 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 14 (2025)
PortsThunderbolt 4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort, power delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, HDMI 2.1, RJ45 Ethernet, 3.5mm combo audio2x USB4, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, HDMI 2.1, microSD (UHS-II), 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
Webcam720p HD1080p + IR
BiometricsNoneIR face (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607 versus Razer Blade 14 (2025)
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2024) FX607Razer Blade 14 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11Windows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup