ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) vs ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite)
62.7Performance44.1
55Display41.6
86.7Battery65.7
50.3Portability78
5 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)2 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite)
InnoReviews verdict
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 63.8 to 54.3, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+21) and performance (+19). ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
- Stronger performance score: 63 vs 44
- Stronger display score: 55 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 66
- 211% higher charging: 280 W vs 90 W
- 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite)
- Stronger portability score: 78 vs 50
- 35% lower weight: 1.42 kg vs 2.2 kg
- 18% lower thickness: 14.7 mm vs 17.9 mm
Display
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) | ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″+3% | 15.6 ″ |
| Panel type | IPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-Sync | OLED (Lumina) |
| Resolution | 2560x1600 | 2880x1620 |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz+38% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) | ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz) | Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 |
| Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7) | Qualcomm Adreno (integrated) |
| RAM | 32 GB+100% | 16 GB |
| RAM type | DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB) | LPDDR5X-8448 (soldered) |
| Storage | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots) | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) | ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,430Bottom 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 13,600Top 48% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) | ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 90 Wh+29% | 70 Wh |
| Web browsing endurance | — | 13 h |
| Charging | 280 W+211% | 90 W |
Design
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) | ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 2.2 kg | 1.42 kg+35% |
| Thickness | 17.9 mm | 14.7 mm+18% |
| Material | Aluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H tested | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) | ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack | 2x USB4 Type-C, 2x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, microSD, 3.5mm |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Webcam | 1080p FHD IR camera | 1080p + IR |
| Biometrics | IR camera with Windows Hello face recognition | IR face (Windows Hello) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) | ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 |
Related comparisons
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)vs ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)vs Alienware 18 Area-51VSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)vs Framework Laptop 13 ProVSASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)vs ASUS ROG Flow Z13 (2025)VSASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite)vs ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 (2024)VSASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite)vs Razer Blade 16 (2025)VSASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite)vs ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)VSASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite)vs Acer Predator Helios 16 (2024)VS