Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) vs MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio

WINNER
ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)
63.8Inno Score
VS
MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
48.8Inno Score
62.7Performance47.8
55Display41.6
86.7Battery54.2
50.3Portability53.8
3 spec wins — ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)2 spec wins — MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio

InnoReviews verdict

ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 63.8 to 48.8, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+33) and performance (+15). MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 63 vs 48
  • Stronger display score: 55 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 54
  • 38% higher Refresh rate: 165 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 17% higher charging: 280 W vs 240 W

Reasons to pick the MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio

  • Stronger portability score: 54 vs 50
  • 11% higher capacity: 100 Wh vs 90 Wh
  • 10% lower weight: 1.99 kg vs 2.2 kg

Display

Display comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Screen size16 ″16 ″
Panel typeIPS-level, anti-glare, 100% sRGB, G-SyncOLED (UHD+)
Resolution2560x16003840x2400
Refresh rate165 Hz+38%120 Hz
Peak brightness—600 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 9 275HX (24C/24T, up to 5.4GHz)Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop GPU, 115W (8GB GDDR7)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM typeDDR5-5600 SO-DIMM (2 slots, upgradeable to 64GB)LPDDR5X-6400 (soldered)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typePCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 SSD (2x M.2 slots)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,450Bottom 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—13,300Bottom 50%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Capacity90 Wh100 Wh+11%
Web browsing endurance—7 h
Charging280 W+17%240 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Weight2.2 kg1.99 kg+10%
Thickness17.9 mm+10%20 mm
MaterialAluminum lid, MIL-STD-810H testedMagnesium-aluminum alloy

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Ports1x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort), 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort / Power Delivery / G-SYNC), 3x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1 FRL, 1x RJ45 LAN, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x Thunderbolt 4, 1x USB-A 3.2, HDMI 2.1, microSD, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
Webcam1080p FHD IR camera1080p + IR
BiometricsIR camera with Windows Hello face recognitionIR face (Windows Hello)

Software

Software comparison: ASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025) versus MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
SpecASUS TUF Gaming F16 (2025)MSI Stealth 16 AI Studio
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup