Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) vs LG Gram 17 (2025)

VS
WINNER
LG Gram 17 (2025)
52Inno Score
37.8Performance41.5
41.6Display24.9
66.7Battery79.8
74Portability76
5 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)4 spec wins — LG Gram 17 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) scores 51.6 against 52 for LG Gram 17 (2025). Pick by the categories that matter to you — LG Gram 17 (2025) edges ahead in battery and performance, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)

  • Stronger display score: 42 vs 25
  • 100% higher Refresh rate: 120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 71% higher Peak brightness: 600 nits vs 350 nits
  • 38% higher charging: 90 W vs 65 W
  • 11% lower thickness: 15.9 mm vs 17.8 mm

Reasons to pick the LG Gram 17 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 42 vs 38
  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 67
  • 21% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,640 vs 2,173
  • 10% lower weight: 1.35 kg vs 1.5 kg

Display

Display comparison: ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Screen size16 ″17 ″+6%
Panel typeOLED, glossy, non-touch (100% DCI-P3, VESA HDR True Black 600)IPS
Resolution3200x20002560x1600
Refresh rate120 Hz+100%60 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits+71%350 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)LG Gram 17 (2025)
ProcessorIntel Core Ultra 7 155HIntel Core Ultra 7 256V
GraphicsIntel Arc GraphicsIntel Arc Graphics 140V
RAM16 GB16 GB
RAM typeLPDDR5X (soldered)LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)
Storage1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage typeM.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSDPCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)2,173Bottom 4%2,640+21%Bottom 44%
Geekbench 6 (multi)11,273+5%Bottom 20%10,700Bottom 12%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Capacity75 Wh77 Wh+3%
Web browsing endurance—16 h
Charging90 W+38%65 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Weight1.5 kg1.35 kg+10%
Thickness15.9 mm+11%17.8 mm
MaterialMetal chassis (MIL-STD-810H tested)Magnesium alloy

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Ports2x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort/PD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, microSD reader, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x USB-A, HDMI, microSD, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
Webcam1080p FHD IR camera with privacy shutter1080p
BiometricsWindows Hello IR face recognition (no fingerprint reader)Fingerprint reader

Software

Software comparison: ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup