ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) vs Razer Blade 16 (2025)
37.8Performance51.2
41.6Display52.2
66.7Battery61.9
74Portability52.5
3 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)6 spec wins — Razer Blade 16 (2025)
InnoReviews verdict
Razer Blade 16 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 54.1 to 51.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+13) and display (+11). ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)
- Stronger battery score: 67 vs 62
- Stronger portability score: 74 vs 53
- 50% higher Peak brightness: 600 nits vs 400 nits
- 30% lower weight: 1.5 kg vs 2.14 kg
- 10% lower thickness: 15.9 mm vs 17.6 mm
Reasons to pick the Razer Blade 16 (2025)
- Stronger performance score: 51 vs 38
- Stronger display score: 52 vs 42
- 211% higher charging: 280 W vs 90 W
- 100% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
- 100% higher RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB
Display
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) | Razer Blade 16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 16 ″ | 16 ″ |
| Panel type | OLED, glossy, non-touch (100% DCI-P3, VESA HDR True Black 600) | OLED |
| Resolution | 3200x2000 | 2560x1600 |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz+100% |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits+50% | 400 nits |
Performance
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) | Razer Blade 16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 |
| Graphics | Intel Arc Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop |
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB+100% |
| RAM type | LPDDR5X (soldered) | LPDDR5X-8000 |
| Storage | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage type | M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD | PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD (2 slots) |
Benchmarks
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) | Razer Blade 16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,173Bottom 4% | 2,780+28%Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 11,273Bottom 20% | 13,400+19%Top 50% |
Battery
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) | Razer Blade 16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 75 Wh | 90 Wh+20% |
| Web browsing endurance | — | 10 h |
| Charging | 90 W | 280 W+211% |
Design
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) | Razer Blade 16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 1.5 kg+30% | 2.14 kg |
| Thickness | 15.9 mm+10% | 17.6 mm |
| Material | Metal chassis (MIL-STD-810H tested) | CNC aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) | Razer Blade 16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Ports | 2x Thunderbolt 4 (DisplayPort/PD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, microSD reader, 3.5mm combo audio jack | 2x USB4, 3x USB-A, HDMI 2.1, SD (UHS-II), 3.5mm |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Webcam | 1080p FHD IR camera with privacy shutter | 1080p + IR |
| Biometrics | Windows Hello IR face recognition (no fingerprint reader) | IR face (Windows Hello) |
Software
| Spec | ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606) | Razer Blade 16 (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 |
Related comparisons
ASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs Alienware m16 R2VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs Lenovo Legion 5i Gen 9 (16IRX9)VSASUS Vivobook S 16 OLED (S5606)vs Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14VSRazer Blade 16 (2025)vs ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 (2024)VSRazer Blade 16 (2025)vs ASUS TUF Gaming A14 (2024)VSRazer Blade 16 (2025)vs ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED (Snapdragon X Elite)VSRazer Blade 16 (2025)vs Acer Predator Helios 16 (2024)VS