Skip to content
InnoReviews

ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) vs LG Gram 17 (2025)

ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)
34.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
LG Gram 17 (2025)
52Inno Score
25.3Performance41.5
23.3Display24.9
33.3Battery79.8
69.7Portability76
2 spec wins — ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)6 spec wins — LG Gram 17 (2025)

InnoReviews verdict

LG Gram 17 (2025) wins this laptop face-off, 52 to 34.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+47) and performance (+16). ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the LG Gram 17 (2025)

  • Stronger performance score: 42 vs 25
  • Stronger battery score: 80 vs 33
  • Stronger portability score: 76 vs 70
  • 300% higher storage: 1,024 GB vs 256 GB
  • 100% higher RAM: 16 GB vs 8 GB

Display

Display comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Screen size16 ″17 ″+6%
Panel typeOLED (100% DCI-P3, 1,000,000:1 contrast)IPS
Resolution1920x12002560x1600
Refresh rate60 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness300 nits350 nits+17%

Performance

Performance comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-101 (8-core, up to 2.97GHz, 30MB cache)Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
GraphicsQualcomm Adreno GPU (integrated)Intel Arc Graphics 140V
RAM8 GB16 GB+100%
RAM typeLPDDR5X (onboard, not upgradeable)LPDDR5X-8533 (on-package)
Storage256 GB1,024 GB+300%
Storage typeM.2 NVMe PCIe SSD (single M.2 2280 slot, single-sided SSD only)PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,640Bottom 39%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,700Bottom 7%

Battery

Battery comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Capacity50 Wh77 Wh+54%
Web browsing endurance—16 h
Charging68 W+5%65 W

Design

Design comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Weight1.6 kg1.35 kg+16%
Thickness16.9 mm+5%17.8 mm
MaterialFull-metal chassis, MIL-STD-810H military-grade durability testingMagnesium alloy

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Ports2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C (DisplayPort/Power Delivery), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x HDMI 2.1, 3.5mm combo audio jack2x Thunderbolt 4, 2x USB-A, HDMI, microSD, 3.5mm
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
WebcamFHD IR camera with Windows Hello support1080p
BiometricsWindows Hello IR camera (no fingerprint reader)Fingerprint reader

Software

Software comparison: ASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA) versus LG Gram 17 (2025)
SpecASUS Vivobook S16 (S5608QA)LG Gram 17 (2025)
Operating systemWindows 11 HomeWindows 11

Related comparisons

Try another matchup