HONOR X9d vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
51.9Performance77.6
78Display59.2
47.4Camera42.1
77Battery59.7
86.7Features94.7
8 spec wins — HONOR X9d4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: HONOR X9d scores 64.7 against 64.9 for Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 edges ahead in performance and features, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the HONOR X9d
- Stronger display score: 78 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 47 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 77 vs 60
- 164% higher Wired charging: 66 W vs 25 W
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8
- Stronger performance score: 78 vs 52
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 87
- 140% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 5 MP
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | HONOR X9d | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.79 ″ | 6.9 ″+2% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1200x2640 | 1080x2520 |
| Pixel density | 427 ppi+7% | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 6,000 nits+100% | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 90.8 %+4% | 87.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | HONOR X9d | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | Samsung Exynos 2600 (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy in the US, Canada and China) |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 911,340Bottom 35% | 2,477,554 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 354,531Bottom 36% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 114,366Bottom 29% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 200,576Bottom 43% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 241,867Bottom 26% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,977Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 10,466Top 5% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 38 %Bottom 2% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB | 256GB/512GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | HONOR X9d | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.75 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 12 MP+140% |
| Max video | 4K | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 16 MP+60% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | HONOR X9d | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 8,300 mAh+93% | 4,300 mAh |
| Wired charging | 66 W+164% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | — | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 14.2 h |
Design
| Spec | HONOR X9d | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 193 g | 180 g+7% |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm+41% | 13.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP66/IP68/IP69/IP69K | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | HONOR X9d | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | HONOR X9d | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (MagicOS 9) | Android 17 (One UI 9) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | HONOR X9d | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
HONOR X9dvs iPhone DuoVSHONOR X9dvs OPPO Reno14 Pro 5GVSHONOR X9dvs Samsung Galaxy S25 EdgeVSHONOR X9dvs Motorola Edge 50 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs realme 15 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 70 FusionVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Motorola Edge 50 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy Z Flip 8vs Huawei nova 14 UltraVS