Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr (2026) vs POCO F4 GT

WINNER
Motorola Razr (2026)
49.4Inno Score
VS
POCO F4 GT

Xiaomi

POCO F4 GT

$599

47.9Inno Score
23.1Performance45.4
60.2Display44.1
54.8Camera33.1
47.2Battery64.2
100Features60
10 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)5 spec wins — POCO F4 GT

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr (2026) wins this phone face-off, 49.4 to 47.9, pulling ahead mainly in features (+40) and camera (+22). POCO F4 GT still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)

  • Stronger display score: 60 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 55 vs 33
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 60
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
  • 275% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 800 nits

Reasons to pick the POCO F4 GT

  • Stronger performance score: 45 vs 23
  • Stronger battery score: 64 vs 47
  • 300% higher Wired charging: 120 W vs 30 W
  • 55% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,720 vs 1,108
  • 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Lower launch price: $599 vs $800

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus POCO F4 GT
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)POCO F4 GT
Screen size6.9 ″+3%6.67 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1080x26402400x1080
Pixel density413 ppi+5%395 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits+275%800 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus POCO F4 GT
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)POCO F4 GT
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7450XSnapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu—1,150,000
Geekbench 6 (single)1,108Bottom 43%1,720+55%Top 40%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,343Bottom 47%4,300+29%Top 44%
Wild Life Extreme stability100 %Top 3%—
RAM (max)8 GB12 GB+50%
Storage options256GB128GB / 256GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus POCO F4 GT
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)POCO F4 GT
Main camera50 MP64 MP+28%
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Max video4K@30fps4K@60fps
Front camera32 MP+60%20 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus POCO F4 GT
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)POCO F4 GT
Capacity4,800 mAh+2%4,700 mAh
Wired charging30 W120 W+300%
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus POCO F4 GT
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)POCO F4 GT
Weight188 g+10%210 g
Thickness7.3 mm+15%8.5 mm
IP ratingIP48—
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus POCO F4 GT
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)POCO F4 GT
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus POCO F4 GT
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)POCO F4 GT
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 12 (MIUI 13)
OS update pledge—2 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus POCO F4 GT
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)POCO F4 GT
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup