Skip to content
InnoReviews

Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

WINNER
Motorola Razr (2026)
49.4Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
34.7Inno Score
23.1Performance27.1
60.2Display34.4
54.8Camera30.1
47.2Battery43.7
100Features49.3
16 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

InnoReviews verdict

Motorola Razr (2026) wins this phone face-off, 49.4 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in features (+51) and display (+26). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)

  • Stronger display score: 60 vs 34
  • Stronger camera score: 55 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 47 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 49
  • 900% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 5 MP

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

  • Stronger performance score: 27 vs 23

Display

Display comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Screen size6.9 ″+3%6.7 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1080x26401080x2340
Pixel density413 ppi+7%385 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness3,000 nits+309%733 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7450XMediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu—510,132Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—211,597Bottom 7%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—43,559Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—110,374Bottom 3%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—144,602Bottom 2%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,108+52%Bottom 43%728Bottom 13%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,343+72%Bottom 47%1,943Bottom 13%
Wild Life Extreme stability100 %+3%Top 3%96 %Top 47%
RAM (max)8 GB8 GB
Storage options256GB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+900%5 MP
Max video4K@30fps1080p@30fps
Front camera32 MP+146%13 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Capacity4,800 mAh5,000 mAh+4%
Wired charging30 W+20%25 W
Wireless charging15 W—

Design

Design comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Weight188 g+6%200 g
Thickness7.3 mm+8%7.9 mm
IP ratingIP48IP54
Frame material—Plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge—6 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Motorola Razr (2026) versus Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
SpecMotorola Razr (2026)Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup