Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
23.1Performance27.1
60.2Display36.6
54.8Camera30.1
47.2Battery55.7
100Features65.3
15 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr (2026) wins this phone face-off, 49.4 to 39.1, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and camera (+25). Samsung Galaxy A16 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 37
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 30
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 65
- 900% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 5 MP
- 275% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 800 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Stronger performance score: 27 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 56 vs 47
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $199 vs $800
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+275% | 800 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 85.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| AnTuTu | — | 509,232Bottom 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 210,242Bottom 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 43,774Bottom 4% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 110,272Bottom 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 144,944Bottom 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108+50%Bottom 43% | 740Bottom 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343+63%Bottom 47% | 2,050Bottom 20% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+900% | 5 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+146% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+6% | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+8% | 7.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP54 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs vivo Y600iVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs POCO M6 Plus 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Lava Play Ultra 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs HONOR X7eVS