Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
23.1Performance29.1
60.2Display44
54.8Camera41.9
47.2Battery43.7
100Features65.3
12 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr (2026) wins this phone face-off, 49.4 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and display (+16). Samsung Galaxy A17 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 47 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 65
- 900% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 5 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- Stronger performance score: 29 vs 23
- Lower launch price: $200 vs $800
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Exynos 1330 |
| AnTuTu | — | 603,772Bottom 11% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 245,695Bottom 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 42,916Bottom 2% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 129,349Bottom 4% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 185,812Bottom 11% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108+12%Bottom 43% | 988Bottom 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343+60%Bottom 47% | 2,093Bottom 21% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+900% | 5 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+146% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+2% | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+3% | 7.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP54 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 30 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs Xiaomi 13 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 20 Pro+VSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs Huawei nova 12 SEVS