Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A35
23.1Performance31.4
60.2Display45.3
54.8Camera41.9
47.2Battery55.7
100Features70.7
12 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr (2026) wins this phone face-off, 49.4 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in features (+29) and display (+15). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 45
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 71
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
- 200% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
- Stronger performance score: 31 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 56 vs 47
- Lower launch price: $399 vs $800
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+5% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+6% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+200% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 84.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| AnTuTu | — | 743,075Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 292,456Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 87,904Bottom 18% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 133,634Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,081Bottom 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108+6%Bottom 43% | 1,050Bottom 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343+13%Bottom 47% | 2,950Bottom 38% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+146% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+10% | 209 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVS