Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
23.1Performance34.7
60.2Display46.2
54.8Camera41.7
47.2Battery52.5
100Features89.3
10 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr (2026) wins this phone face-off, 49.4 to 47.4, pulling ahead mainly in display (+14) and camera (+13). Samsung Galaxy A36 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 46
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 89
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
- Stronger performance score: 35 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 53 vs 47
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 50% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 30 W
- Lower launch price: $400 vs $800
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+150% | 1,200 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| AnTuTu | — | 816,934Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 304,148Bottom 27% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 133,245Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 150,052Bottom 20% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 229,489Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108+9%Bottom 43% | 1,016Bottom 33% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343+15%Bottom 47% | 2,902Bottom 35% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+4% | 195 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+2% | 7.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs Tecno Camon Slim 4GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs HMD SkylineVS