Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A52
23.1Performance23.1
60.2Display35.6
54.8Camera48.4
47.2Battery39
100Features54.7
14 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A52
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr (2026) wins this phone face-off, 49.4 to 37, pulling ahead mainly in features (+45) and display (+25). Samsung Galaxy A52 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 48
- Stronger battery score: 47 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 55
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A52
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $349 vs $800
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+6% | 6.5 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2400x1080 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+2% | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+275% | 800 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Snapdragon 720G |
| AnTuTu | — | 395,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108+52%Bottom 43% | 730Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343+76%Bottom 47% | 1,900Bottom 12% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh+7% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+1% | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+14% | 8.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs realme C75VSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Huawei P30 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs realme 14x 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A52vs Redmi 17C 5GVS