Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A55
23.1Performance37.9
60.2Display46.1
54.8Camera46.8
47.2Battery52.7
100Features78.7
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A55
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Motorola Razr (2026) scores 49.4 against 48.4 for Samsung Galaxy A55. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Motorola Razr (2026) edges ahead in features and display, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 46
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 79
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 200% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,000 nits
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A55
- Stronger performance score: 38 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 53 vs 47
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Lower launch price: $449 vs $800
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+5% | 6.6 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+6% | 390 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+200% | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 85.8 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
| AnTuTu | — | 997,950Bottom 40% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 353,082Bottom 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 224,206Bottom 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 162,521Bottom 32% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 258,141Bottom 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 1,150+4%Bottom 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 3,400+2%Bottom 48% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 1 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+12% | 213 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+12% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs OPPO F33 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs Redmi Note 13 Pro (4G)VSSamsung Galaxy A55vs iQOO Z9x 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A55vs TECNO SPARK 40 Pro+VS