Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy A56
23.1Performance42.5
60.2Display48.5
54.8Camera42.6
47.2Battery58.2
100Features89.3
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A56
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy A56 wins this phone face-off, 51.6 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+19) and battery (+11). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 49
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 43
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 89
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A56
- Stronger performance score: 43 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 58 vs 47
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 50% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 30 W
- 22% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,350 vs 1,108
- Lower launch price: $499 vs $800
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+150% | 1,200 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 87.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
| AnTuTu | — | 1,227,862Bottom 42% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 466,860Bottom 48% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 292,734Bottom 44% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 171,100Bottom 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 297,168Bottom 41% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 1,350+22%Top 49% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 3,900+17%Top 48% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 0 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+5% | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+2% | 7.4 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP67 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 (One UI 7) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy A56 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A56vs POCO F6VSSamsung Galaxy A56vs REDMI Note 15 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A56vs TECNO CAMON Slim 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A56vs iPhone 14 ProVS