Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
23.1Performance28.9
60.2Display58.5
54.8Camera41.7
47.2Battery61.9
100Features65.3
8 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr (2026) wins this phone face-off, 49.4 to 47.6, pulling ahead mainly in features (+35) and camera (+13). Samsung Galaxy M47 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 65
- 900% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 5 MP
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 10% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.1 mm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy M47 5G
- Stronger performance score: 29 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 62 vs 47
- 50% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 30 W
- 25% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | — | 86.8 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+900% | 5 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+9% | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+10% | 8.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP64 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy M47 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy M47 5Gvs Honor 90VSSamsung Galaxy M47 5Gvs Infinix NOTE 40 Pro+ 5GVSSamsung Galaxy M47 5Gvs Infinix ZERO FlipVSSamsung Galaxy M47 5Gvs iPhone 17eVS