Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
23.1Performance29.1
60.2Display55.1
54.8Camera56.4
47.2Battery41.7
100Features73.3
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Motorola Razr (2026) wins this phone face-off, 49.4 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in features (+27) and battery (+6). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 47 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,299
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 29 vs 23
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 20% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 413 ppi
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3088x1440 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 496 ppi+20% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+100% | 1,500 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| AnTuTu | — | 500,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108+23%Bottom 43% | 900Bottom 22% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343+26%Bottom 47% | 2,650Bottom 27% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP+116% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 12 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh+7% | 4,500 mAh |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+10% | 208 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+10% | 8.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Stainless steel |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VS