Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
23.1Performance54.3
60.2Display59.7
54.8Camera69.9
47.2Battery62.8
100Features78.7
6 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)7 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 62.6 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+31) and battery (+16). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 79
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 71% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,750 nits
- 20% lower weight: 188 g vs 234 g
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,200
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 54 vs 23
- Stronger camera score: 70 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 63 vs 47
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 81% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,000 vs 1,108
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+1% | 6.8 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3088 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 501 ppi+21% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+71% | 1,750 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.9 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 1,677,954Bottom 50% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 550,163Bottom 51% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 416,322Bottom 47% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 277,973Bottom 51% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 433,496Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 2,000+81%Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 5,400+62%Top 34% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 10 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 12 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+20% | 234 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+19% | 8.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 13 (One UI 5.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs Xiaomi 13 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs Huawei Mate 70 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs Huawei Mate XTs Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy S23 Ultravs realme 16 Pro+ 5GVS