Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
23.1Performance57
60.2Display52.9
54.8Camera46.1
47.2Battery52.6
100Features94.7
9 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE wins this phone face-off, 56.9 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+34) and battery (+5). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger display score: 60 vs 53
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 46
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Stronger performance score: 57 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 53 vs 47
- 97% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,600 vs 3,343
- 94% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 1,108
- Lower launch price: $650 vs $800
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+7% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+58% | 1,900 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 88 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
| AnTuTu | — | 1,838,177Top 48% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 599,112Top 42% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 548,608Top 49% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 285,170Top 49% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 405,287Bottom 49% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 2,150+94%Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 6,600+97%Top 28% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+317% | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh+2% | 4,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 30 W+20% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 11 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+12% | 213 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+9% | 8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S24 FEvs iPhone 14 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S24 FEvs OPPO Find X5 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S24 FEvs OPPO Reno14VSSamsung Galaxy S24 FEvs vivo V70 Lite 5GVS