Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
23.1Performance90
60.2Display62.7
54.8Camera74
47.2Battery61.2
100Features94.7
4 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 76 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+67) and camera (+19). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 167% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 12 MP
- 15% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 2,600 nits
- 12% lower weight: 188 g vs 214 g
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,299
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 90 vs 23
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 61 vs 47
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 256% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 11,900 vs 3,343
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 6.9 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3120x1440 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 498 ppi+21% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits+15% | 2,600 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,437,807Top 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 1,017,509Top 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,344,505Top 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 390,717Top 19% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 685,076Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 3,850+247%Top 1% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 11,900+256%Top 1% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+167% | 12 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 5,000 mAh+4% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 60 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 25 W+67% |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+12% | 214 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+8% | 7.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Titanium |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs REDMI K80 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Honor 500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Redmi K100 ProVS