Motorola Razr (2026) vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
23.1Performance86.1
60.2Display61.6
54.8Camera50.2
47.2Battery67.5
100Features94.7
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 wins this phone face-off, 71.2 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+63) and battery (+20). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 50
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 95
- 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
- 90% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 100 % vs 53 %
- 25% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 9.7 mm
- Lower launch price: $800 vs $1,900
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
- Stronger performance score: 86 vs 23
- Stronger battery score: 68 vs 47
- 218% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,528 vs 1,108
- 218% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,619 vs 3,343
- 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″ | 7.6 ″+10% |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2448x1848 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi+2% | 404 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,947,517 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 3,528+218%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 10,619+218%Top 4% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %+90%Top 3% | 53 %Bottom 11% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256GB/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+220% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 20 W+33% |
| Active use endurance | — | 13.8 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+6% | 201 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+25% | 9.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP48 |
| Frame material | — | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 17 (One UI 9) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Google Pixel 11 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Samsung Galaxy S26+VSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Vivo X500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs iQOO Z10 TurboVS