Motorola Razr (2026) vs TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
23.1Performance25.9
60.2Display75.9
54.8Camera60.5
47.2Battery66.6
100Features73.3
5 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)6 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
InnoReviews verdict
TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G wins this phone face-off, 55.7 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+19) and display (+16). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
- Stronger display score: 76 vs 60
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 67 vs 47
- 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
- 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1208x2644 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 429 ppi+4% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108+5%Bottom 43% | 1,057Bottom 39% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343+6%Bottom 47% | 3,148Bottom 43% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP+56% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,500 mAh+35% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g | — |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+6% | 7.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP66/IP68/IP69/IP69K |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | HiOS 16 (Android 16) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | — |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs POCO M8 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs HONOR X60 ProVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs iQOO Z11SVSTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvs vivo T4 ProVS