Motorola Razr (2026) vs TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
23.1Performance28.9
60.2Display74.2
54.8Camera45.9
47.2Battery61.9
100Features65.3
2 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)6 spec wins — TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
InnoReviews verdict
TECNO CAMON Slim 5G wins this phone face-off, 51.6 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+15) and display (+14). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger camera score: 55 vs 46
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 65
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON Slim 5G
- Stronger performance score: 29 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 60
- Stronger battery score: 62 vs 47
- 50% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 30 W
- 25% higher capacity: 6,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1208x2644 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 429 ppi+4% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | — | 89.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | MediaTek Dimensity 7300e |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+525% | 8 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | — |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,000 mAh+25% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 45 W+50% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g | 171 g+9% |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 6.4 mm+12% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69K |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | HiOS 16 (Android 16) |
| OS update pledge | — | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | TECNO CAMON Slim 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs POCO F6VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs REDMI Note 15 5GVSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy A56VSTECNO CAMON Slim 5Gvs iPhone 14 ProVS