Motorola Razr (2026) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
23.1Performance93.3
60.2Display82.3
54.8Camera84.6
47.2Battery91.5
100Features84
3 spec wins — Motorola Razr (2026)11 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+70) and battery (+44). Motorola Razr (2026) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Motorola Razr (2026)
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 84
- 19% lower weight: 188 g vs 232 g
- 11% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.2 mm
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 93 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 60
- Stronger camera score: 85 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 47
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
Display
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+1% | 6.82 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 510 ppi+23% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits+50% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7450X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | — | 4,085,695 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,108Bottom 43% | 3,730+237%Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,343Bottom 47% | 11,494+244%Top 3% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 100 %Top 3% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP+56% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,800 mAh | 6,600 mAh+38% |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 100 W+233% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 16 h |
Design
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 188 g+19% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+11% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | — | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Motorola Razr (2026) | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Motorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs Tecno Pova 8 5GVSMotorola Razr (2026)vs vivo T3 Pro 5GVSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS